Over
the past few years that I have been writing opinion pieces for various
newspapers and publications, there have been critics of some of my
columns. I know you are going to find that hard to believe but there are
some people who just do not agree with me and some are even vociferous
enough to offer their criticisms in writing to those newspapers. For an
opinion writer this is always a good thing though. First, you know
someone is reading your stuff, and secondly, you strike a nerve.
On
more than one occasion the critics have used the same argument. It is
almost as if they get their criticism from the same talking points. This
is what they say. “Everybody is entitled to their own opinion but, they
are not entitled to their own facts.” This, to me, is a very
interesting position. It assumes that they, the critics, somehow have
facts about particular situations or events that I do not have. It
further assumes that the facts they possess are true and mine are false.
This
is my contention. Unless you have first hand knowledge of an event
either by witnessing it or by experiencing it, all you know about that
event is what you have been told either by the media or some other news
source. Then you have to assume that your source of news is true and
without agenda.
Over
the years during many of my debates with both fans and critics, I find
many people read or listen to only the headlines and never dig into the
whole story. In addition, I find my most vocal critics trust as their
only source of news the major media outlets i.e., The New York Times,
the big four TV networks, ABC, NBC, CBS, or CNN. Some even use as their
news source PBS or NPR. I don’t think anybody has ever used FOX as a
source of their disagreement with me but it could happen.
If
these are your only sources of information, then you have no true idea
of what the facts are. All of these so-called news sources are private
businesses attempting to sell their services (news, commentary, etc.),
and as such are edited down to a position that satisfies the agenda of
their advertisers, shareholders, and managers. Facts become
inconveniences that are dealt with as such.
And
so you ask, “What are the facts?” I have found that the truth often
lies in the middle. Take any story that is in the news, then watch,
read, and listen to several sources of that story. Listen to the agenda
that each reporter tries to sell. Whether you hear it or read it, it is
there. The prejudice of the reporter or his organization will shine
through. The liberal position will have the most sources, all the major
media as previously reported in this piece, and the conservative
position will be offered by FOX and AM talk radio. Of course there is
also the Internet and it is all over the place. But, if you care enough,
you can find the best semblance of the truth. It just takes a little
work. Fortunately for you, my lucky readers, I do that for you.
Seriously though, you have to be diligent. Just because The New York
Times reports it doesn’t necessarily make it true. In fact that is all
the more reason to be skeptical.
Many
years ago in the simpler times, we had three TV networks and PBS ran
kid’s programs. They told us what they wanted us to know and rarely did
we question it. That has all changed now and the media has done it to
themselves. If you really want to know the “facts,” either go beyond the
headlines, use several sources, or just read my columns.
Ron Scarbro, March 28, 2012
Wednesday, March 28, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
Here,here although most liberals appear to need to be led around by the nose.
Deena
re: "the facts"
An excellent novel that will have you wondering about the facts: Baldacci-"The Whole Truth."
His comments after the epilogue about "Perception Management Companies" is also of interest.
As always, a fine column.
Steve
Post a Comment