In every state we have
traffic laws. We have speed limits. We have drinking while driving laws. These
laws are designed to protect us while we are out on the road. We have these
protections and still every day dozens of people are killed and injured by speeders,
drunks, and all sorts of traffic mishaps. Does this mean that our laws are
insufficient? Does this mean these laws don’t really protect us? Or does this
possibly mean that some people just don’t obey laws?
Did you know that in the
case of this latest mass shooting in El Paso, it was illegal to bring any guns
into the mall where twenty-two innocent people were gunned down and dozens of
others were injured? Do you think the evil piece of human waste who perpetrated
that crime cared one bit about the law? It has even been reported that this
slimeball bought his gun legally. Do you think that if he couldn’t legally buy
a gun that he wouldn’t get one anyway?
As a nation, we need to
wake up. Feel-good legislation is just that. When an evil individual has an
evil intention, he will find a way, unless he is stopped.
Today thousands of
people are screaming to their lawmakers to do something. Pass new laws. Stop
the violence. Make all this ugliness go away. Help us feel better. Suspend the
Second Amendment. Arrest people for their evil thoughts before they commit any
crimes. Never mind what the Constitution says. We need to be protected.
Well, we might just as
well pass laws against lightning. We all know of people who obey the laws. They
never speed or drink and drive. In every regard they are model citizens and
still, they are victims of senseless crime, or tragic traffic accidents. Things
happen. And they rarely happen on our schedule.
Some say there are just
too many guns. I, on the other hand espouse a different belief. What if I told
you rather than too many guns, I said there are too few guns? What if, in the
El Paso situation, some legal gun owner standing nearby pulled out his own
weapon and blew the head off the shooter when he started shooting?
What if, rather than a
sign indicating that mall was a gun free zone, it said instead, our good
citizens who shop here are probably armed and skilled at stopping crime. Do you
think the perpetrator might have looked elsewhere for victims?
If you saw the video of
the shooting in Dayton, Ohio, you saw police advancing immediately on the scene
with their guns blazing. The killer was dead in seconds. It has been suggested
that had this clown gotten inside the bar, dozens of innocent people would have
been killed or wounded. Simply stated, it takes a gun to stop a gun.
Usually it takes longer
for the police to arrive. They don’t normally prevent crimes, they clean up
after the crime has been committed.
Most of the citizens of
this great country are law abiding people. Most, I am sure, would prefer the
police take care of crime. But sometimes one’s choices are few and we have to
act.
Personally, I am a
military veteran who has received extensive training in firearms of all sorts.
I also have a license to carry concealed weapons. It is my hope and my belief
that if I were ever in the unlikely situation of being confronted by an active
shooter, that should I not survive, I would be found with an empty gun in my
hand because I would have emptied it on the shooter.
Ron Scarbro
No comments:
Post a Comment